
SG History 10101 Sep 2008
SG History 101 - Stage Appearance
![]() A couple of months ago, we looked at the history of a curious phenomenon in gospel music history…namely, the unusual attraction and attention paid to the genre’s many outstanding bass singers. The Vaughan Quartet, ca. 1920s, one of the very first popular gospel quartets, they appeared in what was to become known as the standard gospel quartet appearance style.The reason behind this had to do with the conscious awareness that the message behind the music was of paramount importance to communicate above all else. If one group member wore something a bit too distinctive, it was felt that it would distract members of the audience from taking in the gospel message described in the song lyrics. Thus, it quickly became the accepted norm for singers to dress in pleasant but otherwise nondistinctive clothing. For the early decades of professional gospel singing, those standards were the required norm, for the reasons stated above. This began to change after World War II(as did most areas of life), with the change in the gospel singing business from a publisher-driven business to a more recording and entertainment-driven business. As gospel singers became more “professional” from an entertainment standpoint, it became more of a professional entertainment career for most of its’ singers. Thus, distinctiveness became more important among gospel music artists in an attempt to separate themselves from each other, and become more widely known. One very popular quartet that formed in the 1930s and was perhaps gospel’s leading quartet until the mid 1950s, the Rangers Quartet, was a leader in this movement. Not only were they the first gospel quartet to become popular with no ties to the music publishers (along with the Chuck Wagon Gang), they used distinctive stage wear to reinforce their image. They began as the Texas Rangers in the 1930s, and they originally combined gospel songs with pop and western hits(as did many other gospel artists of that period). To show their “western” image off, they occasionally wore cowboy hats and western fashions to show their “western” authenticity. They did that for many years before going to a full gospel repertoire. Their appearance and their distinctive style indeed set them apart from the many other quartets of the day. So fashion was an instrument that could be used to establish a group’s reputation in the music business, even the gospel music business. ![]() The Klaudt Indian Family, ca. 1960s, the appearance of this famous family gospel group reflected their American Indian heritage. From the parents to all the children, anyone watching the Klaudts would know that 1. They were great singers and musicians…2. They were God-loving and God-honoring people…and 3. They were of American Indian heritage. Those facts made them one of gospel’s most distinctive and beloved groups. ![]() Cover of the 1963 Plainsmen LP, Lonely Street...the Plainsmen were one quartet unafraid to be a bit flamboyant in their appearance on occasion. ![]() The Oak Ridge Boys, 1973, the Oaks were among the trendsetters in the trend toward a more youth-oriented approach in southern gospel music. That brief fad was eclipsed by groups who became more popular during the 1970s, such as the Inspirations, the Cathedral Quartet, and the Kingsmen, who brought a more traditional look and style to the genre. That tradition continued through the 1980s by those groups and others, such as Gold City, who followed faithfully in those traditions. But in recent years, there has been a more concerted attempt to get away from those older traditions, not out of disregard or disrespect for them, but as a reflection of the more casual professional look of modern times. Signature Sound, ca. 2007, one of southern gospel's most popular current groups, they get a lot of attention for their unique appearance (they don't look so bad, do they?)So is there a right or wrong in this never ending discussion? As I said at the outset of this article, you decide. My hope is that this look back at what we did in past generations has been helpful to you in making up your mind on this issue. I want to thank Dean Adkins for graciously supplying some of the pictures you see in this article. Reader Comments
I agree that how distinctively people are dressed does not distract from the music. However, the apostle Paul made the statement that if eating meat offends my brother, I'll eat no meat. My point is that there are many wonderful Christians who are sg fans that have convictions concerning a certain type of dress in a worship service. I believe Gospel singers should be more focused on making everyone comfortable worshipping together than they are on fashion. That does not mean they need matching suits and ties or dresses, but we should be aware of the basics that offend people and try to work with that. Many people are offended by men with bluejeans with holes in them in the sanctuary or leading the worship. Is that really such a big deal? Wear pants without holes. That's a good compromise. You can still wear jeans. They will have to overlook that if they don't like it. Same with women. You don't need to wear ugly sack dresses that match, but we all know a lot of people have views against ladies wearing pants on stage. So wear a skirt of some sort. If they don't like the fact that it is trendy, tough. You have made a good compromise. Most people respect you more for considering their beliefs and trying not to offend. Wear what you want off stage, but it should not be too much to ask that we try and accomodate to a point. You are putting yourself in front of people and asking them to buy tickets and c.d.'s and video's, you should respect them as well and try to be non-controversial. I am saying this as a business management specialist. This is what I do. I am also a Christian and I believe it is important to work together and respect beliefs even if we don't have those convictions or if it infringes on our fashion. These are not unreasonable requests.
Commented by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) On 09/01/2008
Hey Dawn, great comment. I agree you can be fashion forward without being offensive. Most artists know what they can and can't get by with depending on the venue. If it's a place you've been before you can kind of judge what you should wear. If its an unfamiliar crowd/venue then play it safe. Not meaning you have to break out the polyester suit, but atleast jeans with no holes. With most people holes in jeans arent a problem just for the ones on stage. Those people typically don't like holes in jeans on anyone anywhere period. I don't have a problem either way, but definately respect others views. Well maybe I should expain, I dont mind jeans that look roughed up and some snags. However if the hole is large enough to fit a hand thru and there is more leg showing than denim, you might as well be wearing running shorts ha ha! Most fans dont really complain for dressing current, its usually when you're pushing the line of modesty when they get testy. Atleast from my experience.
Commented by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) On 09/02/2008
Chris J. Becker
Commented by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) On 09/02/2008
I'm sitting here relaxing in my tee shirt, cutoffs and bare feet reading your delightful and informative article. And I'm reminded that the Bible says, "Man looketh on the outward appearance but God looketh upon the heart." Thank goodness the concertgoers can't see me now. But if God's not paying any attention to the way I'm dressed anyway, what's the big deal?
So maybe for the next concert I'll just go the way I'm dressed. Perhaps I'll tuck in my tee shirt though. I'm glad that variety is the spice of life. Let the singers dress how they feel comfortable. My taste in clothing is not good enough to pass judgment on anyone else.
Commented by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) On 09/03/2008
Hey Neil, here's a little exercise for you to see if your convictions hold solid. Go to church this Sunday dressed just as you are. No one is saying that God looks on the outside, people are just saying that there are some places that are appropriate to wear cut offs and a t-shirt and some places that are not. Try going to work in those clothes, do you think you'll get sent home or applauded for your individualism? I dont have a problem with being casual on stage, my only stipulation be that persons are modest whether they be in casual clothes or top of the line ball gowns.
Commented by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) On 09/04/2008
Uh . . . Jackie, I was joking. Sorry you took me seriously. I do try to dress my best for the house of God.
Help me John!
Commented by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) On 09/04/2008
My big beef about Ernie Haas and SS is that they have to don a style that is foreign to everyone and never been done before. I have never seen men wear short ties like they do until I saw them. I had not consistently seen guys with hair all spiked up until I saw them. Of course they wear suits and do look professional, and boy can they sing, but to me it is a distraction to wear something so out of the norm that I sit back and question why they do this. I can only come up with one answer...to draw attention to themselves. There are plenty of groups wearing jeans with holes in them and a suit coat over top, groups who wear matching outfits, groups who dress more in evening wear......my point being that this is not something that most people would think is out of the norm because it's been done before and is being done. But why create a whole new style and draw specific attention to yourself? The attention needs to be placed on one person and Him alone. And that's just my opinion.
Commented by Cheryl Campbell On 09/05/2008
Hey Neil, I read that first thing in the morning before I was completely coherent ha ha. My statement was probably worded a little more harsh than it was intended. Honestly not trying to single you out. We need smiley faces or something on these things so we can convey intent
Commented by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) On 09/05/2008
Cheryl...SSQ use their outfits to draw attention...and that's okay with me.
On a personal note though..i think their clothes are horrific...and screaming we're supposed to be 'hip'. But people like it, and i truly admire them for their boldness..i was a gamble..could have backfired on them just as easily, but it turns out to be succesful. Plus that they are responsable for drawing younger folk to SG concerts, as we all know the average age at SG concert was moving to 50+ yrs. And they can sing...it took me several years to look beyond their outfits...that's telling more about me, then i care for..lol I salute Ernie and his posse! Auke
Commented by Auke On 09/06/2008
Jackie-
No harm done to me. Actually I agree with you. It was just a bit of attempted humor that apparently fizzled. The unfortunate truth is that when I dress up to go to church or a concert, I'm in the minority. I would hate to be in the necktie business today.
Commented by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) On 09/06/2008
|
About This Article
SG History 101 - Stage Appearance
Favorited by: • John Scheideman (What's an RSS feed?) Recent FeaturesArchives |
|